Label Your AI vs Human Code in Commit

Quick Tip for Better Team Collaboration
Since many teams already have their git commit practices, here’s a simple addition that makes a big difference:
AI-Generated Code:
Thore are good examples from my https://github.com/jellydn/moleculer-typescript-template/


In short, we should keep this as a convention for git.
feat: implement user authentication
[AI-Generated | Human Supervised]
Human-Written Code:
Here is the some example from my https://github.com/jellydn/tiny-nvim

feat: implement user authentication
[Engineer-Written]
Why Do This?
Reviewers know what they’re looking at instantly
Team learns from both AI and human approaches
Builds trust in AI tools through transparency
Creates clear accountability
Bonus Tip: Clean Up AI Comments
AI tools often generate redundant or overly verbose comments. Clean them up:
Remove:
// This function calculates the sum of two numbers
function add(a, b) {
return a + b; // Returns the sum of a and b
}
Keep:
function add(a, b) {
return a + b;
}
Only keep comments that explain why, not what.
Just Add It
If you’re already updating your commit standards, consider adding this. It takes 5 seconds per commit and saves everyone time during reviews.
Your team will appreciate the clarity.
ITMan's Blog - 📚 Lifelong Learner